Wikipedia Reputation Agency

Shape How The World Sees You On Wikipedia

250+ Pages managed
97% Approval rate
10 yrs Editorial experience

Wikipedia Eligibility Assessment

Get a real assessment based on Wikipedia’s actual notability standards.

Sources added 0/30
Add Reputable Sources — News, Magazines, Books, Journals, Documentaries, Achieves.
Why Wikiable — A Standards-First Wikipedia Consultancy

Standards-first Wikipedia consultancy

Why Wikiable.

Built for credibility — not publicity.

The premise

Wikipedia is not a marketing platform — it's a reputation platform.

Coverage in credible, independent sources is the only currency that counts here.

Most firms approach Wikipedia the way they approach media — as space to be bought. Wikipedia doesn't work that way, and treating it that way is how articles get rejected, flagged, and removed.

We work the way the platform actually works: evidence first, policy first, and an honest answer about whether your organization is ready. Through in-depth research, strategic guidance, and a working command of Wikipedia's policies, we help organizations, executives, authors, and public figures decide with clear eyes.

We don't take shortcuts, and we don't make promises we can't stand behind.

See if your organization qualifies

The Hidden Risks

Why Most Wikipedia Projects Fail

Too many Wikipedia projects begin with writing an article before knowing whether the subject is actually ready for one.

We begin by determining whether the subject is genuinely ready, before recommending any writing or next steps.

A well-written article can still fail when it's written for the client instead of Wikipedia's editorial standards.

Every article is written to meet Wikipedia's editorial expectations, not to sound promotional or persuasive.

Many people focus on getting a page published, only to face challenges, corrections, or deletion requests later.

We focus on building articles that can stand up to Wikipedia's ongoing editorial review, not just publication.

Wikipedia never stands still. Articles can become outdated as sources, facts, and editorial standards continue to evolve.

We continue monitoring published articles to help keep them accurate, current, and consistent with Wikipedia's standards.

Not every subject is ready for Wikipedia today, and starting too early often leads to unnecessary setbacks.

If the timing isn't right, we'll explain what's missing and when the subject is genuinely ready to proceed.

Approach

What makes us different

Policy-Aligned

Every recommendation is built on Wikipedia's actual policies — so nothing we propose puts your article, or your name, at risk.

Independent Review

Work is evaluated by unaffiliated editors — the same standard applied to any other article on the platform.

Confidential by Default

Client identities are never disclosed. For the executives and public figures we work with, discretion isn't a courtesy — it's part of the engagement.

Long-Term Protection

We monitor published articles for drift, vandalism, and policy changes long after launch.

Accountability

What we guarantee — and what no one can

Our commitment, in writing

Four commitments we make to every client — and the one thing no honest firm will ever promise you.

Talk to us before you commit to anything
  • We assess whether a subject meets Wikipedia's notability standard before any commitment is made — not after payment.
  • Any paid contribution is disclosed in line with Wikipedia's Terms of Use. We don't operate through undisclosed or concealed accounts.
  • Compliance isn't a moral preference — it's the only approach that lasts. Non-compliant articles get found and removed, and a deleted article does more reputational damage than none at all.
  • No one — including us — can guarantee an article stays published permanently. Wikipedia is governed by its own independent volunteer community, not by any agency. What we can guarantee is that the work meets policy standards at every stage.

Proof

The record behind the standard

15+

Years inside Wikipedia's rules Practising since 2010

500+

Articles researched & monitored Tracked past publication

20+

Countries served Across five continents

Let's find out if Wikipedia is right for you.

Every engagement starts with a readiness review — we assess your sourcing, tell you honestly where you stand, and you decide what happens next. If it's not the right fit, we'll tell you that too.

Book a consultation

30 minutes. Confidential. No obligation.

Not ready to talk? Read how we assess notability
Editorial Process
The Wikiable Framework Six Stages

The Editorial Method.

How we take a subject from a notable claim to a stable, citable article — a working editor's discipline, staged and observable.

Notability Review WP:N

Editorial Eligibility Assessment

We test the subject against Wikipedia's notability guideline — independent coverage, depth, and durability — before a single word is drafted.

Disclosure · WP:PAID. All engagements comply with Wikipedia's paid-editing disclosure policy. We do not guarantee publication or immunity from community review — no credible editor can.

Wikiable — Client Success Stories

★ CLIENT SUCCESS STORIES

Trusted by Brands, Executives & Public Figures Worldwide

Wikipedia is built on credibility, not promotion. Our clients trust Wikiable for honest guidance, deep research and policy‑compliant strategies that stand the test of time.

  • 4.9Average Client Rating
  • 500+Articles Supported
  • 15+Years Experience
Professional, responsive and incredibly knowledgeable. They helped us navigate Wikipedia with confidence.
Alex Roberts Founder, Technology Company ★★★★★ ✓ Verified

Built on credibility, trusted for results.

About Us

Lorem, ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Tempore ipsam alias quae cupiditate quas, neque eum magni impedit asperiores.

Contact Us

121 King St, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia.